« Previous Entries

Next Entries »

A fear of being branded racist

Oct 20 2005

Last Wed­nes­day a fiery and pas­sio­nate race row took place on BBC Radio 4’s Mid­week radio broad­cast pre­sen­ted by Libby Pur­ves. Joan Rivers became furiously enra­ged when Dar­cus Howe announ­ced that the term “black” offen­ded her; Rivers let loose, fren­ziedly exc­lai­ming, “How dare you call me a racist! How dare you!”

In less dra­ma­tic cir­cums­tan­ces, my hou­se­mate explai­ned to us in a car jour­ney this mor­ning that she found a par­ti­cu­lar lec­ture pro­ble­ma­tic. Not because the con­tent was unin­te­res­ting but because she found it dif­fi­cult to unders­tand the deeply-accented words of her world-renowned Spa­nish lec­tu­rer. As she elu­ci­da­ted her rea­so­ning she pro­fu­sely and repea­tedly said, “I don’t want to sound racist but?” My level-headed friend was afraid to express her fee­lings and thoughts about com­mu­ni­ca­tion dif­fi­cul­ties in lec­ture thea­tres for fear of being bran­ded a racist.

We live in a world where we are inc­rea­singly told that racism is evil, and that we should con­ti­nue to fight the cau­ses of and stamp out racism within our society. Each of us is han­ded a civil res­pon­si­bi­lity to pre­vent racially-motivated oppres­sion at all costs. Yet as this res­pon­si­bi­lity is inc­rea­singly for­ced upon us, we are fin­ding it ever more dif­fi­cult to speak our minds. We keep our thoughts to our­sel­ves, for hea­ven for­bid we should say something poli­ti­cally inco­rrect. Desc­ri­bing someone as ‘black’ has become a poli­ti­cal mine­field. When poin­ting out a friend to another we pause to con­si­der our desc­rip­tion; should he be iden­ti­fied as Black, Afri­can, African-Caribbean, African-American? Who are we to make assump­tions about his origins?

This kind of anxiety is all too com­mon in our politically-paranoid society, and is often counter-productive. How can we ever escape racism if we fear the reper­cus­sions of calling a black per­son black?

The situa­tion is not hel­ped by over­bea­ring black anti-racism esta­blish­ments, which report every poten­tially racial mis­de­mea­nour and spe­cia­lise in exactly the kind of anta­go­nism that fuels such inse­cu­ri­ties. Publi­ca­tions such as weekly news­pa­per The Voice, billed as ‘Britain’s Best Black News­pa­per’ pro­vide an out­let for black com­mu­ni­ties to express their con­cerns. Yet in a world of glo­ba­li­sa­tion where cul­tu­res have become intert­wi­ned, and a society which con­ti­nually stri­ves to pre­vent its own segre­ga­tion, the con­cept of publi­ca­tions aimed at a sin­gu­lar race appear enti­rely hypoc­ri­ti­cal, and fun­da­men­tally at odds with such social aspi­ra­tions. Com­mu­ni­ties facing racial oppres­sion should have a public out­let to voice their con­cerns, yet is a news­pa­per, read solely by a black ‘par­ti­tion’, the best medium for this? Ima­gine the outrage if a ser­vice or publi­ca­tion were aimed exc­lu­si­vely at white peo­ple. “White News” would be a natio­nal scan­dal, assu­redly denoun­ced by the govern­ment as racial slur.

It is my belief that dif­fe­rent cul­tu­ral back­grounds pro­vide for mul­ti­va­riate skills and talents. Afri­cans are dif­fe­rent to Indians in the same way that East Asians are dif­fe­rent to Wes­tern Euro­peans. It is enti­rely pos­si­ble that these races of peo­ple have dis­pro­por­tio­nate abi­li­ties in an assort­ment of acti­vi­ties. To ignore such fun­da­men­tal dif­fe­ren­ces bet­ween peo­ple is sheer igno­rance, for we are each indi­vi­duals and we are all very dif­fe­rent. To use these dif­fe­ren­ces against each other is real racism. Con­trary to the com­mon mis­con­cep­tion; the prac­tice of racism lies not in ack­now­led­ging these dif­fe­ren­ces, but in using them in a demea­ning and inhu­mane man­ner. To announce that some­body is black is not insul­ting and it is not racist. Simi­larly, fin­ding an accen­ted Spaniard’s English dif­fi­cult to inter­pret is also understandable.

Should you now dis­co­ver that the author of this piece is indeed black, con­si­der how it would effect your opi­nion of it. It is the white fear of and the black obses­sion with the recog­ni­tion of dif­fe­rence that will fore­ver allow racism to haunt us, even when those who are truly racist are long gone. As Joan Rivers argued, “It is not about black or white, it is about people.”

Hurricane Fury

Sep 4 2005
I have found the res­ponse to this hurri­cane truly des­pi­ca­ble con­si­de­ring the notice given and the expec­ted devas­ta­tion. Surely someone should have plan­ned a com­prehen­sive relief effort should the worst happen.

I agree with these sta­te­ments and couldn’t word them any bet­ter, so here is a quote from Something Awful:

Rich, myself, Lives­tock, and pro­bably some of the other wri­ters have been watching the hurri­cane after­math with nothing short of dumb shock. There is a disas­ter going on right now and it is man­made. The disas­ter is three stran­gers in Mis­sis­sippi, together because they’re all that’s left and alone in a town without buil­dings, drin­king flood­wa­ter pollu­ted by corp­ses, shit and gaso­line. The disas­ter is a woman wading through waist deep streets hol­ding her daugh­ter and won­de­ring why the trucks won’t stop to get her out of the city. The disas­ter is ICU patients dying one after another because die­sel didn’t flow and order couldn’t be kept. It’s an unin­te­rrup­ted chain of per­so­nal disas­ters. It’s inept triage on a natio­nal scale. It’s unbe­lie­va­ble that this is America.

It’s hard to com­prehend that these repea­ting ima­ges of herds of peo­ple without food or water or medi­cal treat­ment after nearly a week are hap­pe­ning on our soil. They’re our fellow citi­zens and while the poli­ti­cians, direc­tors, plan­ners and gene­rals con­gra­tu­late each other at press con­fe­ren­ces they are suf­fe­ring and dying. I have seen some efforts in the media to pres­sure offi­cials to accept res­pon­si­bi­lity. None have, because in public office the buck stops nowhere. The only per­son I have really seen come close to cap­tu­ring the raw fury of the peo­ple trap­ped in New Orleans or for­got­ten in Mis­sis­sippi and Ala­bama is CNN’s Ander­son Coo­per. He con­fron­ted Democ­ra­tic Sena­tor Mary Lan­drieu on live TV, chi­ding her with a voice crac­king with emo­tion that he couldn’t believe the poli­ti­cians were pat­ting each other on the back over a job well done when he just saw rats eating a woman’s body in the street of Biloxi. On the Inter­net I’ve seen peo­ple bla­tantly pla­cing blame on Bush, FEMA, Con­gress, the Natio­nal Guard, and even Home­land Secu­rity.

Who is res­pon­si­ble? Who should be bla­med? All of them. This is a colos­sal fai­lure of our govern­ment to care for and pro­tect its citi­zenry on every con­cei­va­ble level. The heroes are the men and women on the scene doing their utmost to help those in need. Coast Guard res­cue wor­kers pluc­king peo­ple to safety and Red Cross wor­kers fee­ding peo­ple from emer­gency kitchens are heroes. The man who com­man­dee­red a bus and got peo­ple out of New Orleans when the govern­ment was woe­fully impo­tent is a hero. The woman who smashed the glass on a con­ve­nience store to loot bott­led water for fif­teen kids who should have been abso­lu­tely inun­da­ted with sup­plies by then is a hero. The doc­tors and nur­ses hand-bagging ven­ti­la­tor patients 24 hours a day in dark hos­pi­tals are heroes. In the ine­lo­quent but true words of the Mayor of New Orleans: “Don’t tell me 40,000 peo­ple are coming here. They’re not here. It’s too dog­gone late. Now get off your asses and do something, and let’s fix the big­gest god­damn cri­sis in the his­tory of this country.” CNN was bet­ter pre­pa­red to deal with this disas­ter than FEMA was.

I am asha­med of my country’s govern­ment in a uni­ver­sal way right now. Repu­bli­cans, democ­rats, oppor­tu­nists, it doesn’t mat­ter; they’re all guilty in this situa­tion. In a magi­cal world where jus­tice is actually ser­ved most of these peo­ple would not have jobs in a month or two. Ins­tead the peo­ple without jobs will be the millions who have lost everything and found their govern­ment with its back tur­ned. Remem­ber that peo­ple are still dying because of this incom­pe­tence. Remem­ber that when each and every one of these fools appears on TV for a photo op or com­plains about “pla­cing blame later,” because pla­cing blame now is the only hope Ame­rica has to change the situation.

In the Uni­ted King­dom somebody’s head would be taken for this. A great num­ber of poli­ti­cians would have accep­ted some ounce of res­pon­si­bi­lity and in hind­sight resig­ned.  It dis­gusts me that no one can step up and say “I was wrong” or “I should have done more”, “It is my fault”. The most power­ful country in the world is doo­med if its lea­ders and offi­cials are only going to cover their own asses and not solve the nation’s problems.
From the BBC:


New Orleans cri­sis sha­mes Ame­ri­cans


At the end of an unfor­get­ta­ble week, one broad­cas­ter on Fri­day bit­terly encap­su­la­ted the sense of bur­ning shame and anger that many Ame­ri­can citi­zens are fee­ling.

The only dif­fe­rence bet­ween the chaos of New Orleans and a Third World disas­ter ope­ra­tion, he said, was that a foreign dic­ta­tor would have res­pon­ded better.

It has been a pro­foundly shoc­king expe­rience for many across this vast country who, for the large part, believe the home-spun myth about the invul­ne­ra­bi­lity of the Ame­ri­can Dream.

The party in power in Washing­ton is always happy to con­vey the impres­sion of 50 sta­tes moving for­ward together in social and eco­no­mic har­mony towards a big­ger and bet­ter America.

That is what pre­si­den­tial cam­paig­ning is all about.

But what the devas­ta­ting con­se­quen­ces of Katrina have shown — along with the res­ponse to it — is that for too long now, the fabric of this com­plex and overs­tretched country, espe­cially in sta­tes like Loui­siana and Mis­sis­sippi, has been neglec­ted and ignored.

Borro­wed time

The fit­ting metaphors rela­ting to the New Orleans debacle are almost too nume­rous to mention.

First there was an extraor­di­nary com­pla­cency, mixed together with what see­med like over-reaction, before the storm.

A genui­nely heroic mayor orders a total eva­cua­tion of the city the day before Katrina arri­ves, kno­wing that for deca­des now, New Orleans has been living on borro­wed time.

The Natio­nal Guard and fede­ral emer­gency per­son­nel stay tuc­ked up at home.

The havoc of Katrina had been pre­dic­ted count­less times on a local and fede­ral level — even to the point where it was ack­now­led­ged that tens of thou­sands of the poo­rest resi­dents would not be able to leave the city in advance.

No offi­cial plan was ever put in place for them.

Aban­do­ned to the ele­ments

The famous levees that were breached could have been strengthe­ned and rai­sed at what now seems like a tri­fling cost of a few billion dollars.

The Bush admi­nis­tra­tion, together with Con­gress, cut the bud­gets for flood pro­tec­tion and army engi­neers, while local poli­ti­cians fai­led to gene­rate any enthu­siasm for local tax inc­rea­ses.

New Orleans partied-on just hoping for the best, aban­do­ned by anyone in natio­nal autho­rity who could have put the money into really pro­tec­ting the city.

Meanwhile, the poo­rest were simi­larly aban­do­ned, as the horrif­ying ima­ges and sto­ries from the Super­dome and Con­ven­tion Cen­ter prove.

The truth was sim­ple and appa­rent to all. If jour­na­lists were there with came­ras bea­ming the suf­fe­ring live across Ame­rica, where were the offi­cers and troops?

The neglect that meant it took five days to get water, food, and medi­cal care to thou­sands of mainly orderly African-American citi­zens des­pe­ra­tely shel­te­ring in huge down­town buil­dings of their native city, has been going on his­to­ri­cally, for as long as the ina­de­quate levees have been there.

Divi­ded city

I should make a con­fes­sion at this point: I have been to New Orleans on assign­ment three times in as many years, and I was smit­ten by the Big Easy, with its uni­que charms and temperament.

But behind the ele­gant into­xi­cants of the French Quar­ter, it was clearly a city gro­tes­quely divi­ded on seve­ral levels. It has twice the natio­nal ave­rage poverty rate.

The govern­ment approach to such depri­va­tion loo­ked more like thought­less con­tain­ment than anything else.

The nightly shoo­tings and drugs-related homi­ci­des of recent years poin­ted to a small but vicious cul­ture of lar­gely black-on-black crime that ever­yone knew exis­ted, but no-one see­med to have any real ans­wers for.

Again, no-one wan­ted to pick up the bill or deal with the rea­li­ties of race rela­tions in the 21st Century.

Too often in the so-called “New South”, they still look posi­ti­vely 19th Century.

“Shoot the loo­ters” is good rhe­to­ric, but no las­ting solution.

Uneasy para­dox

It is asto­nishing to me that so many Ame­ri­cans seem shoc­ked by the exis­tence of such con­cen­tra­ted poverty and social neglect in their own country.

In the wor­kout room of the condo where I am currently sta­ying in the affluent LA neigh­bourhood of Santa Monica, an exe­cu­tive and his per­so­nal trai­ner igno­red the anguished tele­vi­sion reports bla­ring above their heads on Fri­day evening.

Either they did not care, or it was somehow too pain­ful to discuss.

When Pre­si­dent Bush told “Good Mor­ning Ame­rica” on Thurs­day mor­ning that nobody could have “anti­ci­pa­ted” the breach of the New Orleans levees, it poin­ted to not only a remote lea­der in denial, but a whole poli­ti­cal class.

The uneasy para­dox which so many live with in this country — of being first-and-foremost rug­ged indi­vi­duals, out to plun­der what they can and paying as little tax as they can get away with, while at the same time belie­ving that Ame­rica is a robust, model society — has reached a cri­sis point this week.

Will there be real invest­ment, or just more buck-passing bet­ween fede­ral agen­cies and states?

The country has to choose whether it wants to rebuild the levees and des­tro­yed com­mu­ni­ties, with no expense spa­red for the future — or once again brush off that res­pon­si­bi­lity, and blame the other guy. 

Revoked American Independance

Aug 21 2005

Revo­ked Ame­ri­can Independance

Dec­la­ra­tion of Revo­ca­tion

To the citi­zens of the Uni­ted Sta­tes of Ame­rica, in the light of your fai­lure to elect a com­pe­tent Pre­si­dent of the USA and thus to govern your­sel­ves, we hereby give notice of the revo­ca­tion of your inde­pen­dence, effec­tive today.

Her Sove­reign Majesty Queen Eli­za­beth II will resume monarchi­cal duties over all sta­tes, com­mon­wealths and other territories.

Except Utah, which she does not fancy.

Your new Prime Minis­ter (The Right Honou­ra­ble Tony Blair, MP for the 97.85% of you who have until now been una­ware that there is a world outside your bor­ders) will appoint a Minis­ter for Ame­rica without the need for further elections.

Con­gress and the Senate will be disbanded.

A ques­tion­naire will be cir­cu­la­ted next year to deter­mine whether any of you noti­ced. To aid in the tran­si­tion to a Bri­tish Crown Depen­dency, the follo­wing rules are intro­du­ced with imme­diate effect:

1. You should look up “revo­ca­tion” in the Oxford English Dic­tio­nary. Then look up “alu­mi­nium.” Check the pro­nun­cia­tion guide. You will be ama­zed at just how wrongly you have been pro­noun­cing it.

The let­ter ‘U’ will be reins­ta­ted in words such as ‘favour’ and ‘neigh­bour’; skip­ping the let­ter ‘U’ is nothing more than lazi­ness on your part. Like­wise, you will learn to spell ‘dough­nut’ without skip­ping half the letters.

You will end your love affair with the let­ter ‘Z’ (pro­noun­ced ‘zed’ not ‘zee’) and the suf­fix “ize” will be repla­ced by the suf­fix “ise.”

You will learn that the suf­fix ‘burgh’ is pro­noun­ced ‘burra’ e.g. Edin­burgh. You are wel­come to re-spell Pitts­burgh as ‘Pitts­berg’ if you can’t cope with correct pronunciation.

Gene­rally, you should raise your voca­bu­lary to accep­ta­ble levels. Look up “voca­bu­lary.” Using the same thirty seven words inters­per­sed with filler noi­ses such as “uhh”, “like”, and “you know” is an unac­cep­ta­ble and inef­fi­cient form of communication.

Look up “interspersed.”

There will be no more ‘bleeps’ in the Jerry Sprin­ger show. If you’re not old enough to cope with bad lan­guage then you shouldn’t have chat shows. When you learn to deve­lop your voca­bu­lary, then you won’t have to use bad lan­guage as often.

2. There is no such thing as “US English.” We will let Mic­ro­soft know on your behalf. The Mic­ro­soft spell-checker will be adjus­ted to take account of the reins­ta­ted let­ter ‘u’ and the eli­mi­na­tion of “-ize.”

3. You should learn to dis­tin­guish the English and Aus­tra­lian accents. It really isn’t that hard. English accents are not limi­ted to cock­ney, upper-class twit or Man­cu­nian (Daphne in Frasier).

You will also have to learn how to unders­tand regio­nal accents — Scot­tish dra­mas such as “Tag­gart” will no lon­ger be broad­cast with subtitles.

While we’re tal­king about regions, you must learn that there is no such place as Devonshire in England. The name of the county is “Devon.” If you per­sist in calling it Devonshire, all Ame­ri­can Sta­tes will become “shi­res” e.g. Texasshire, Flo­ri­dashire, Louisianashire.

4. Holly­wood will be requi­red occa­sio­nally to cast English actors as the good guys. Holly­wood will be requi­red to cast English actors to play English characters.

Bri­tish sit-coms such as “Men Beha­ving Badly” or “Red Dwarf” will not be re-cast and wate­red down for a wishy-washy Ame­ri­can audience who can’t cope with the humour of occa­sio­nal poli­ti­cal incorrectness.

5. You should relearn your ori­gi­nal natio­nal anthem, “God Save The Queen”, but only after fully carr­ying out task 1. We would not want you to get con­fu­sed and give up half way through.

6. You should stop pla­ying Ame­ri­can “foot­ball.” There is only one kind of foot­ball. What you refer to as Ame­ri­can “foot­ball” is not a very good game.

The 2.15% of you who are aware that there is a world outside your bor­ders may have noti­ced that no one else plays “Ame­ri­can” foot­ball. You will no lon­ger be allo­wed to play it, and should ins­tead play pro­per football.

Ini­tially, it would be best if you pla­yed with the girls. It is a dif­fi­cult game. Those of you brave enough will, in time, be allo­wed to play rugby (which is simi­lar to Ame­ri­can “foot­ball”, but does not involve stop­ping for a rest every twenty seconds or wea­ring full kev­lar body armour like nancies).

We are hoping to get together at least a US Rugby sevens side by 2005.

You should stop pla­ying base­ball. It is not rea­so­na­ble to host an event called the ‘World Series’ for a game which is not pla­yed outside of Ame­rica. Since only 2.15% of you are aware that there is a world beyond your bor­ders, your error is unders­tan­da­ble. Ins­tead of base­ball, you will be allo­wed to play a girls’ game called “roun­ders,” which is base­ball without fancy team strip, over­si­zed glo­ves, collec­tor cards or hotdogs.

7. You will no lon­ger be allo­wed to own or carry guns. You will no lon­ger be allo­wed to own or carry anything more dan­ge­rous in public than a vege­ta­ble pee­ler. Because we don’t believe you are sen­si­ble enough to handle poten­tially dan­ge­rous items, you will require a per­mit if you wish to carry a vege­ta­ble pee­ler in public.

8. July 4th is no lon­ger a public holi­day. Novem­ber 2nd will be a new natio­nal holi­day, but only in England. It will be called “Inde­ci­sive Day.”

9. All Ame­ri­can cars are hereby ban­ned. They are crap, and it is for your own good. When we show you Ger­man cars, you will unders­tand what we mean.

All road inter­sec­tions will be repla­ced with roun­da­bouts. You will start dri­ving on the left with imme­diate effect. At the same time, you will go metric with imme­diate effect and without the bene­fit of con­ver­sion tables. Roun­da­bouts and metri­ca­tion will help you unders­tand the Bri­tish sense of humour.

10. You will learn to make real chips. Those things you call ‘French fries’ are not real chips. Fries aren’t even French, they are Bel­gian though 97.85% of you (inc­lu­ding the guy who dis­co­ve­red fries while in Europe) are not aware of a country called Bel­gium. Those things you insist on calling potato chips are pro­perly called “crisps.” Real chips are thick cut and fried in ani­mal fat. The tra­di­tio­nal accom­pa­ni­ment to chips is beer which should be ser­ved warm and flat.

Wai­tres­ses will be trai­ned to be more aggres­sive with customers.

11. As a sign of penance 5 grams of sea salt per cup will be added to all tea made within the Com­mon­wealth of Mas­sachu­setts, this quan­tity to be dou­bled for tea made within the city of Bos­ton itself.

12. The cold tas­te­less stuff you insist on calling “beer” is not actually beer at all, it is lager . From Novem­ber 1st only pro­per Bri­tish Bit­ter will be refe­rred to as “beer,” and Euro­pean brews of known and accep­ted pro­ve­nance will be refe­rred to as “Lager.” The subs­tan­ces for­merly known as “Ame­ri­can Beer” will hen­ce­forth be refe­rred to as “Near-Frozen Gnat’s Urine,” with the excep­tion of the pro­duct of the Ame­ri­can Bud­wei­ser com­pany whose pro­duct will be refe­rred to as “Weak Near-Frozen Gnat’s Urine.” This will allow true Bud­wei­ser (as manu­fac­tu­red for the last 1000 years in the Czech Repu­blic) to be sold without risk of confusion.

13. From Novem­ber 10th the UK will har­mo­nise petrol (or “gaso­line,” as you will be per­mit­ted to keep calling it until April 1st 2005) pri­ces with the for­mer USA. The UK will har­mo­nise its pri­ces to those of the for­mer USA and the For­mer USA will, in return, adopt UK petrol pri­ces (roughly $6/US gallon — get used to it).

14. You will learn to resolve per­so­nal issues without using guns, law­yers or the­ra­pists. The fact that you need so many law­yers and the­ra­pists shows that you’re not adult enough to be inde­pen­dent. Guns should only be hand­led by
adults. If you’re not adult enough to sort things out without suing someone or spea­king to a the­ra­pist, then you’re not grown up enough to handle a gun.

15. Please tell us who killed JFK. It’s been dri­ving us crazy.

16. Tax collec­tors from Her Majesty’s Govern­ment will be with you shortly to ensure the acqui­si­tion of all reve­nues due (back­da­ted to 1776).

Thank you for your co-operation.

Yahoo Launches Audio Search (impressive)

Aug 4 2005

Saw this on Insi­de­Goo­gle,

quote:

Yahoo has appa­rently deci­ded that, now that they have an ad net­work tar­ge­ted at blog­gers, it is time for them to release all of their blog-related ser­vi­ces in deve­lop­ment. As a result, here is Yahoo Audio Search, which can find you pod­casts. Accor­ding to The New York Times, Yahoo claims to have inde­xed 50 million music, voice and other audio files.

The ser­vice will also dis­play links to the online sites where users can pay to down­load a song. Most major music sites have agreed to send Yahoo lists of their songs and pay a com­mis­sion on every song sold. The current ver­sion of the ser­vice has no adver­ti­sing, but Mr. Horo­witz said ads might be added later.

You can refine your searches by music, pod­casts or other audio, by song, artist or album, by for­mat (RAM, MP3, MIDI, WMA or AAC) by dura­tion (more or less than a minute), by web & audio ser­vi­ces or audio ser­vi­ces only, and by major relea­ses or to inc­lude alter­na­tes, imports, EPs, etc.. Smartly, the pod­cast results have links to the RSS feeds.


http://​audio​.search​.yahoo​.com/

This is an extre­mely nifty release. Take these exam­ple searches and results:
(Pur­po­sely tes­ting with les­ser known artists)

Vene­tian Sna­res: Search
Clic­king the artist brings up a dis­co­graphy and list of albums.
Clic­king the song gives a list of legal loca­tions for down­load, cost, qua­lity, for­mat, abi­lity to burn to cd,
Quick links inc­lude Y! music link to artist, bio­graphys and reviews.
There is also a matching artists page on the right hand side to give quick access to dis­co­graphies of searched terms.

From the dis­co­graphy page:
For­mat: Album Cover, Title (Record Label, Year of Release)
Sort relea­ses by popu­la­rity, date and title.
On the right Yahoo auto­ma­ti­cally searches ima­ges, the web and video and dis­plays the first results from each in a sin­gle column.
Find CD link under each album links to Yahoo shop­ping and gives a list of online out­lets to purchase the cd.
For more well known artists there are “Simi­lar artist” links also.

Clic­king an album cover takes you to the ” album brow­ser”:
This lets you quickly browse an artists albums. On clic­king from the brow­ser you are pre­sen­ted with a trac­klis­ting and all the avai­la­ble legal online down­load loca­tions for that song.

You can also select your pre­fe­rred audio ser­vice from one of these:

quote:

None
Artist­Di­rect
Audio­Lunch­box
Buy​Mu​sic​.com
dMu­sic
eMu­sic
Epi­to­nic
Gara­ge­Band
iTu­nes
Live­down­loads
MP34U
MSN Music
Music­match
Naps­ter
Pas­sA­long
Real­Pla­yer Music Store
Rhap­sody
SoundC­lick
Yahoo! Music Unli­mi­ted


Moving on to Pod­casts:
Search for engad­get: Engad­get Pod­cast
Notice the last published date and direct link to the RSS feeds.
Here’s another pod­cast search: BBC

There’s also an “other audio” option which I have yet to try.

The irony of banning GTA due to sex

Jul 25 2005

Inside Fire­fox:
“Games­top has deci­ded to stop stoc­king Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas. Pro­bably because parents might buy this game for their kids, and it has (shock) sex in it now acces­si­ble via a dif­fi­cult to apply mod (on the PS2 at least). I guess using a pros­ti­tute, killing her and taking the money back, mas­sac­ring pedes­trians and stea­ling things is fine family fun, but con­sen­sual sex isn’t? For shame, Games­top. You try and act like you’re above this, but ins­tead you show how unen­ligh­te­ned you actually are.”

I just read this at Insi­de­Fi­re­fox lin­ked to above. I agree com­ple­tely and think this “hot cof­fee” mod thing is going a little too far. Although I’m sure the bri­tish 18 cer­ti­fi­cate ade­qua­tely covers this.

« Previous Entries

Next Entries »