« Previous Entries

Next Entries »

Firefox 2.0 — Fix tabs

Oct 24 2006

The new Fire­fox release is great, espe­cially the built in and seam­lessly inte­gra­ted spell chec­ker, this should dra­ma­ti­cally improve all those poorly spe­lled posts and web pages we see everywhere. The new glass theme and high­ligh­ting is an impro­ve­ment (in my opi­nion) and new built in Phishing tools are also a posi­tive deve­lop­ment. Other note­worthy fea­tu­res inc­lude ses­sion saver, and sug­ges­tions in the search box. To test this release with regards to the ill-fated memory leak I loa­ded up a page of 20 or so ani­ma­ted GIFs which pre­vious ver­sions would choke on and die a pain­ful death, the page still saw a large inc­rease in page-file usage and some slow down but after brow­sing away from the page it all disap­pea­red and I didn’t have to res­tart the browser.

A cou­ple of things I don’t like, or maybe I am just not used to, are the chan­ges to tabs. The chan­ges give a fixed mini­mum width and a hori­zon­tal scro­lla­ble tool­bar when the num­ber of tabs exceed the screen width and also a “Close” icon on each tab. So I thought it would be help­ful to state here how to change the tabs back to “the old style” ( i.e. FF 1.x):

Remove Close But­ton
To remove the close but­ton from each tab and ins­tead place one but­ton in the top right, in the about:config file change browser.tabs.closeButtons to “3”
(For more details see: http://​kb​.mozi​lla​zine​.org/​B​r​o​w​s​e​r​.​t​a​b​s​.​c​l​o​s​e​B​u​t​t​ons ).

Fit More Tabs on the Page
To do this you have to reduce the mini­mum width of tabs. Once again, using the about:config file change browser.tabs.tabMinWidth to a value of your choice. The chan­ges will not be appa­rent until you res­tart Firefox.

For the com­plete run down visit: Mozi­lla­zine

Polish up the old Google

Oct 21 2006

I follow the inner wor­kings of Goo­gle fre­quently through the exce­llent blogs “Goo­gle Blo­gos­co­ped” and ” Insi­de­Goo­gle “. I get exci­ted when new goo­gle pro­ducts are announ­ced, when upgra­des are imple­men­ted and gene­rally every time Goo­gle makes my Inter­net life a little easier. A Gmail and Rea­der tab lie open con­ti­nually, I use Goo­gle ad pro­ducts to pro­mote and earn from, I use goo­gle book­marks, search his­tory, per­so­na­li­zed home­page, calen­dar, groups and obviously search. I am sure I have at least dab­bled with most other relea­ses also. So I sing my prai­ses where I can, indeed I spent a half hour ses­sion with my last boss sho­wing him all the ins and outs of Gmail and all those subtle little fea­tu­res you need someone to showcase.

But then again not everything is per­fect in the inc­rea­singly large and amorphous world of the GOOG. In gene­ral, the spate of recent relea­ses and acqui­si­tions over the last year or so has left Goo­gle with an assort­ment of great and good pro­ducts that need more dedi­ca­ted deve­lop­ment time and ove­rall inte­gra­tion with other ser­vi­ces to become truly use­ful. It has become inc­rea­singly dif­fi­cult to find or even remem­ber that Goo­gle has a sui­ta­ble method for dea­ling with a cer­tain enquiry. Google’s aim is to orga­nise and make avai­la­ble the world’s infor­ma­tion — I fail to see how this can be achie­ved when their own deve­lop­ment pro­ce­dure and release metho­do­lo­gies lead towards an inc­rea­singly dif­fi­cult plane to cir­cum­na­vi­gate. It is a white-walled maze -


For all is clean and clear but hid­den behind a thou­sand doors.

The fain­test ilk of an inte­gra­tion pro­cess bet­ween pro­ducts is appa­rent in the new blue bar atop of Gmail and other ser­vi­ces, a loose link to the other tools you haven’t yet used. I will now take this oppor­tu­nity to list some areas within goo­gle pro­ducts and ser­vi­ces that I feel should be addres­sed, impro­ved or pro­vi­ded, paying par­ti­cu­lar atten­tion to the idea of focu­sed inte­gra­tion and impro­ved user experience.

The sim­plest and most effec­tive inte­gra­tion is to pro­vide access to all search ser­vi­ces through a sin­gle search box. Blog search, News search, Book search, Scho­lar, Groups, Ima­ges, Finance, Video, Froo­gle, Maps, Code search — they all require you to visit their little sec­tion of goo­gle. For cer­tain search terms one box results appear sug­ges­ting a search using a dif­fe­rent tool and the top alter­na­tive search links are avai­la­ble for video, ima­ges, etc. The recent addi­tion of the pop-up more box is also help­ful. But I feel this is not enough.

There is no method to simul­ta­neously search more than one ser­vice. This could be addres­sed using search ope­ra­tors within the search box, for instance:

  • Iraq War #blog #news” could search both blog search and news search for results on the Iraq War — or alter­na­ti­vely “searchblog,searchnews:Iraq War
  • Scar­lett Johans­son #ima­ges #video” to search for both videos and images.
  • Lite­rary cri­ti­cism #books #scho­lar -#nor­mal­search ” a search for lite­rary cri­ti­cism in books and scho­lar, exc­lu­ding nor­mal goo­gle search
  • all:Johnny Depp” searches all ser­vi­ces and pro­vi­des for exam­ple the top result for each with an expan­da­ble box that can pro­vide a further 5 results or a list of results simi­lar to nor­mal que­ries but with an icon indi­ca­ting which ser­vice gene­ra­ted the result and left-aligned thumb­nails for ima­ges, videos, etc. For ins­tance the list could con­tain first a link to Depp’s IMDB page, secondly a link and thumb­nail for the trai­ler to Pira­tes of the Carib­bean 2, thirdly some ima­ges and fourthly a recent blog post.
  • media:Buffy the Vam­pire Sla­yer” — auto­ma­ti­cally searches the media ser­vi­ces for infor­ma­tion (e.g. ima­ges, video)
  • research:Capacitive Tomo­graphy” — auto­ma­ti­cally searches .edu and .ac​.uk sites, scho­lar, books, wiki­pe­dia and other valued resources.
  • latest:Halo Movie ” — auto­ma­ti­cally searches news, blogs and sites recently updated.

I think you can quickly see the power of this approach and I haven’t even touched upon local searches or finance. Of course the exact imple­men­ta­tion is just my spe­cu­la­tion, another approach could be a list of check-able boxes. In advan­ced options you could ask that goo­gle auto­ma­ti­cally search all their ser­vi­ces for you (simi­lar to the all: ope­ra­tor) and pro­vide you with rele­vant results from across the board, based on some algo­rithm that knows based on your search term which ser­vi­ces are most rele­vant. Of course each of the main search ser­vi­ces has their own spe­ci­fic user inter­face and something that could accom­mo­date them all would be nee­ded, though I am sure it is all pos­si­ble. Cus­tom and save-able search ope­ra­tors, simi­lar to Yahoo’s approach are another option Goo­gle has not yet pursued.

Search His­tory, an inva­lua­ble tool needs expan­ding to all of Google’s search ser­vi­ces also. It is slowly get­ting there and I ima­gine in a few months it will be avai­la­ble for most if not all ser­vi­ces. Why not expand this ser­vice to let users choose what his­to­ries they wish to keep and dis­card? Why not pro­vide a search ope­ra­tor that auto­ma­ti­cally exc­lu­des a search term from the search his­tory ( e.g. #nohis­tory). With the power of Firefox’s exten­si­bi­lity search his­tory could also be expan­ded to search boxes on domains of a user’s choo­sing. For ins­tance I often want to see what I have searched for on Wiki­pe­dia, You­Tube or various coding sites. To save terms searched for on any domain would be a power­ful tool. Obviously for the sake of pri­vacy and secu­rity this should be opt-in by the user and they should retain com­plete con­trol over the data being sto­red. Of course this could be expan­ded to an exten­sion that sto­res your his­tory online and saves search terms from all sites — but this would gene­rate a slew of pri­vacy fears from the quite right secu­rity zealots.

Tools are the second big issue and these should ulti­ma­tely be inte­gra­ted. The recent grea­se­mon­key script that puts Rea­der into Gmail is the clea­rest and most influen­tial indi­ca­tion of the power of inte­gra­tion. At pre­sent I have to login using a hun­dred dif­fe­rent forms to access a hun­dred dif­fe­rent tools that have little to no inte­ro­pe­ra­bi­lity. The Rea­der into gmail approach is a nice idea and one that could be expan­ded up on:

  • “Files” — A list of docu­ments rela­ted to your goo­gle account i.e. those in spreadsheets and docs, groups (files in the new beta), pages and pos­sibly Gmail attach­ments. The list could indi­cate per­mis­sions, size, file type, last acces­sed and direct links to edi­ting them online (or an auto­ma­tic pro­cess to edit them locally and re-upload only chan­ges using the Goo­gle desk­top search client). This could extend to directly edi­ting Gmail attach­ments without having to down­load and re-upload to docs. Pho­tos from Picasa and uploa­ded blog­ger files could also be inc­lu­ded in this list. Each of these files could also be labe­lled as per the gmail tra­di­tion and of course be search-able both for the file and in the file.
  • “His­tory” — An inte­gra­tion of search his­tory into Gmail that could inc­lude terms you have used to search through your mail and “saved searches” that could be quite com­plex (like the grea­se­mon­key script ” save per­sis­tent searches”)
  • “Blog” — Post directly to blog­ger from Gmail without having to send posts via email — I much pre­fer the edi­tor in Gmail and I gene­rally use it to com­pose all of my posts. The abi­lity to edit from Gmail would also save me having to login to blog­ger to correct chan­ges or add after thoughts — espe­cially con­si­de­ring I have Gmail open all the time. Once again a list of pre­vious posts and asso­cia­ted files could be made and use the new blogger-beta labe­lling sys­tem. Add mul­ti­ple blogs in settings.
  • “Sche­dule” — Show calen­dar inside Gmail — please, please please.
  • “Links” — A list of hyper­links that have appea­red in emails or mul­ti­ple emails recently with the option to store them to Goo­gle Book­marks. The num­ber of times I have to search for the email that con­tai­ned the link to the web page I have for­got­ten is annoying.
  • Make all of the above options smart (i.e. don’t show blogs if they don’t have a blog­ger account) and give the user the abi­lity to disa­ble them.

Little things:

  • “Add word to dic­tio­nary” option within Gmail rich text edi­tor, though this may be redun­dant con­si­de­ring the new spellcheck fea­ture coming in Fire­fox 2.0.
  • Save advan­ced search options to account not just locally — I like to see 100 results and have Safe­Search off, this often gets reset.
  • Use the inline expan­sion of topics in Rea­der within Gmail to quickly read new mail as an option and to pro­vide some sort of con­sis­tent interface.
  • Quick add items to calen­dar using Gmail or Goo­gle search boxes (e.g. using calen­dar:) operator.
  • Gmail: Use label colour coding as shown by Matt Cutts.
  • Gmail: Rele­gate Spam to a label that inco­ming mail can also be applied to.
  • Gmail: Export to PDF (and other simi­lar for­mats in ‘docs’) for emails.
  • Gmail: Pro­vide extra secu­rity, a search for “pass­word” in gmail should ask the user to input their account pass­word again to ensure Gmail has not been left log­ged in accidentally.
  • A ses­sion mana­ge­ment con­sole. Oops I left myself log­ged in on a public PC — delete the ses­sion remo­tely to pre­serve security.
  • Zeit­geist for email — who has emai­led me most, who have I emai­led most, most popu­lar email domains, who have I chat­ted to most, etc.
  • In Goo­gle Rea­der, let it recog­nise my own site feed (or let me define this) and if it’s blog­ger pro­vide a link to quickly and effi­ciently edit the post.

If you have made it to the bot­tom of this post I applaud you and if there is anything you think I have for­got­ten or there are fea­tu­res and chan­ges you want to see feel free to leave a note in the comments.

  • Discussion
  • Comments Off

Don’t buy Dell

Jul 20 2006

In brief, this should sway you from ever thin­king of purcha­sing a Dell machine.

Woe betide my Dell, (Renata’s Blog)

Some quo­tes:
Tech: When you go around the web — yes? On your brow­ser pro­gram. You can run into bad pro­grams called viru­ses. And these viru­ses can cause all the pro­blems you are tal­king about.
Me: I know what a virus is. I don’t have a virus.
Tech: But viru­ses cause all your pro­blems. You have a virus — yes?
Me: I do not have a virus. I have a hard­ware fire­wall on the rou­ter. I have a soft­ware fire­wall on the com­pu­ter. I have up to date com­mer­cial virus pro­tec­tion that upda­tes its defi­ni­tions on the fly and I have sche­du­led full sys­tem virus scans that run every night at 3 AM. I do not have a virus.
Tech: Well, you know, too much secu­rity can cause pro­blems too.

The first tech was ada­mant that the pro­blem was not rela­ted to memory, and that there were only three cau­ses for bluesc­reens: a bad mother­board, a bad hard drive, or soft­ware con­flicts. She explai­ned, again, that she had just repla­ced the mother­board and hard drive. “Must be soft­ware,” the tech said. Exas­pe­ra­ted now, my tech explai­ned that she had just repla­ced the hard drive, so there was no soft­ware on the machine. He still insis­ted it was a soft­ware pro­blem and refu­sed to send memory. In fact, he sug­ges­ted something that I will be wri­ting to Dell about. He actually sug­ges­ted that she ins­tall only one of the four memory modu­les, close the box, deter­mine quickly if that module was okay, and then leave, telling me to con­ti­nue ins­ta­lling Win­dows and call tech sup­port if I had any more pro­blems! He actually sug­ges­ted to her that she LEAVE OUT 1.5 GB of my memory, memory I paid for, pre­su­mably without telling me what had been done.

Engad­get: Dell Lap­tops Exploding…

Dell knew dozens of their lap­tops had sus­tai­ned exten­sive heat damage at least two years before ini­tia­ting any kind of recall. The source, who is clai­med to be someone “close to the com­pany,” has said that Dell execs were pro­vi­ded with docu­ments and pho­to­graphs in 2003 and 2004 sho­wing lap­pies desc­ri­bed as “bur­ned,” “mel­ted” and even “scorched.”

  • Discussion
  • Comments Off

A fear of being branded racist

Oct 20 2005

Last Wed­nes­day a fiery and pas­sio­nate race row took place on BBC Radio 4’s Mid­week radio broad­cast pre­sen­ted by Libby Pur­ves. Joan Rivers became furiously enra­ged when Dar­cus Howe announ­ced that the term “black” offen­ded her; Rivers let loose, fren­ziedly exc­lai­ming, “How dare you call me a racist! How dare you!”

In less dra­ma­tic cir­cums­tan­ces, my hou­se­mate explai­ned to us in a car jour­ney this mor­ning that she found a par­ti­cu­lar lec­ture pro­ble­ma­tic. Not because the con­tent was unin­te­res­ting but because she found it dif­fi­cult to unders­tand the deeply-accented words of her world-renowned Spa­nish lec­tu­rer. As she elu­ci­da­ted her rea­so­ning she pro­fu­sely and repea­tedly said, “I don’t want to sound racist but?” My level-headed friend was afraid to express her fee­lings and thoughts about com­mu­ni­ca­tion dif­fi­cul­ties in lec­ture thea­tres for fear of being bran­ded a racist.

We live in a world where we are inc­rea­singly told that racism is evil, and that we should con­ti­nue to fight the cau­ses of and stamp out racism within our society. Each of us is han­ded a civil res­pon­si­bi­lity to pre­vent racially-motivated oppres­sion at all costs. Yet as this res­pon­si­bi­lity is inc­rea­singly for­ced upon us, we are fin­ding it ever more dif­fi­cult to speak our minds. We keep our thoughts to our­sel­ves, for hea­ven for­bid we should say something poli­ti­cally inco­rrect. Desc­ri­bing someone as ‘black’ has become a poli­ti­cal mine­field. When poin­ting out a friend to another we pause to con­si­der our desc­rip­tion; should he be iden­ti­fied as Black, Afri­can, African-Caribbean, African-American? Who are we to make assump­tions about his origins?

This kind of anxiety is all too com­mon in our politically-paranoid society, and is often counter-productive. How can we ever escape racism if we fear the reper­cus­sions of calling a black per­son black?

The situa­tion is not hel­ped by over­bea­ring black anti-racism esta­blish­ments, which report every poten­tially racial mis­de­mea­nour and spe­cia­lise in exactly the kind of anta­go­nism that fuels such inse­cu­ri­ties. Publi­ca­tions such as weekly news­pa­per The Voice, billed as ‘Britain’s Best Black News­pa­per’ pro­vide an out­let for black com­mu­ni­ties to express their con­cerns. Yet in a world of glo­ba­li­sa­tion where cul­tu­res have become intert­wi­ned, and a society which con­ti­nually stri­ves to pre­vent its own segre­ga­tion, the con­cept of publi­ca­tions aimed at a sin­gu­lar race appear enti­rely hypoc­ri­ti­cal, and fun­da­men­tally at odds with such social aspi­ra­tions. Com­mu­ni­ties facing racial oppres­sion should have a public out­let to voice their con­cerns, yet is a news­pa­per, read solely by a black ‘par­ti­tion’, the best medium for this? Ima­gine the outrage if a ser­vice or publi­ca­tion were aimed exc­lu­si­vely at white peo­ple. “White News” would be a natio­nal scan­dal, assu­redly denoun­ced by the govern­ment as racial slur.

It is my belief that dif­fe­rent cul­tu­ral back­grounds pro­vide for mul­ti­va­riate skills and talents. Afri­cans are dif­fe­rent to Indians in the same way that East Asians are dif­fe­rent to Wes­tern Euro­peans. It is enti­rely pos­si­ble that these races of peo­ple have dis­pro­por­tio­nate abi­li­ties in an assort­ment of acti­vi­ties. To ignore such fun­da­men­tal dif­fe­ren­ces bet­ween peo­ple is sheer igno­rance, for we are each indi­vi­duals and we are all very dif­fe­rent. To use these dif­fe­ren­ces against each other is real racism. Con­trary to the com­mon mis­con­cep­tion; the prac­tice of racism lies not in ack­now­led­ging these dif­fe­ren­ces, but in using them in a demea­ning and inhu­mane man­ner. To announce that some­body is black is not insul­ting and it is not racist. Simi­larly, fin­ding an accen­ted Spaniard’s English dif­fi­cult to inter­pret is also understandable.

Should you now dis­co­ver that the author of this piece is indeed black, con­si­der how it would effect your opi­nion of it. It is the white fear of and the black obses­sion with the recog­ni­tion of dif­fe­rence that will fore­ver allow racism to haunt us, even when those who are truly racist are long gone. As Joan Rivers argued, “It is not about black or white, it is about people.”

Hurricane Fury

Sep 4 2005
I have found the res­ponse to this hurri­cane truly des­pi­ca­ble con­si­de­ring the notice given and the expec­ted devas­ta­tion. Surely someone should have plan­ned a com­prehen­sive relief effort should the worst happen.

I agree with these sta­te­ments and couldn’t word them any bet­ter, so here is a quote from Something Awful:

Rich, myself, Lives­tock, and pro­bably some of the other wri­ters have been watching the hurri­cane after­math with nothing short of dumb shock. There is a disas­ter going on right now and it is man­made. The disas­ter is three stran­gers in Mis­sis­sippi, together because they’re all that’s left and alone in a town without buil­dings, drin­king flood­wa­ter pollu­ted by corp­ses, shit and gaso­line. The disas­ter is a woman wading through waist deep streets hol­ding her daugh­ter and won­de­ring why the trucks won’t stop to get her out of the city. The disas­ter is ICU patients dying one after another because die­sel didn’t flow and order couldn’t be kept. It’s an unin­te­rrup­ted chain of per­so­nal disas­ters. It’s inept triage on a natio­nal scale. It’s unbe­lie­va­ble that this is America.

It’s hard to com­prehend that these repea­ting ima­ges of herds of peo­ple without food or water or medi­cal treat­ment after nearly a week are hap­pe­ning on our soil. They’re our fellow citi­zens and while the poli­ti­cians, direc­tors, plan­ners and gene­rals con­gra­tu­late each other at press con­fe­ren­ces they are suf­fe­ring and dying. I have seen some efforts in the media to pres­sure offi­cials to accept res­pon­si­bi­lity. None have, because in public office the buck stops nowhere. The only per­son I have really seen come close to cap­tu­ring the raw fury of the peo­ple trap­ped in New Orleans or for­got­ten in Mis­sis­sippi and Ala­bama is CNN’s Ander­son Coo­per. He con­fron­ted Democ­ra­tic Sena­tor Mary Lan­drieu on live TV, chi­ding her with a voice crac­king with emo­tion that he couldn’t believe the poli­ti­cians were pat­ting each other on the back over a job well done when he just saw rats eating a woman’s body in the street of Biloxi. On the Inter­net I’ve seen peo­ple bla­tantly pla­cing blame on Bush, FEMA, Con­gress, the Natio­nal Guard, and even Home­land Secu­rity.

Who is res­pon­si­ble? Who should be bla­med? All of them. This is a colos­sal fai­lure of our govern­ment to care for and pro­tect its citi­zenry on every con­cei­va­ble level. The heroes are the men and women on the scene doing their utmost to help those in need. Coast Guard res­cue wor­kers pluc­king peo­ple to safety and Red Cross wor­kers fee­ding peo­ple from emer­gency kitchens are heroes. The man who com­man­dee­red a bus and got peo­ple out of New Orleans when the govern­ment was woe­fully impo­tent is a hero. The woman who smashed the glass on a con­ve­nience store to loot bott­led water for fif­teen kids who should have been abso­lu­tely inun­da­ted with sup­plies by then is a hero. The doc­tors and nur­ses hand-bagging ven­ti­la­tor patients 24 hours a day in dark hos­pi­tals are heroes. In the ine­lo­quent but true words of the Mayor of New Orleans: “Don’t tell me 40,000 peo­ple are coming here. They’re not here. It’s too dog­gone late. Now get off your asses and do something, and let’s fix the big­gest god­damn cri­sis in the his­tory of this country.” CNN was bet­ter pre­pa­red to deal with this disas­ter than FEMA was.

I am asha­med of my country’s govern­ment in a uni­ver­sal way right now. Repu­bli­cans, democ­rats, oppor­tu­nists, it doesn’t mat­ter; they’re all guilty in this situa­tion. In a magi­cal world where jus­tice is actually ser­ved most of these peo­ple would not have jobs in a month or two. Ins­tead the peo­ple without jobs will be the millions who have lost everything and found their govern­ment with its back tur­ned. Remem­ber that peo­ple are still dying because of this incom­pe­tence. Remem­ber that when each and every one of these fools appears on TV for a photo op or com­plains about “pla­cing blame later,” because pla­cing blame now is the only hope Ame­rica has to change the situation.

In the Uni­ted King­dom somebody’s head would be taken for this. A great num­ber of poli­ti­cians would have accep­ted some ounce of res­pon­si­bi­lity and in hind­sight resig­ned.  It dis­gusts me that no one can step up and say “I was wrong” or “I should have done more”, “It is my fault”. The most power­ful country in the world is doo­med if its lea­ders and offi­cials are only going to cover their own asses and not solve the nation’s problems.
From the BBC:


New Orleans cri­sis sha­mes Ame­ri­cans


At the end of an unfor­get­ta­ble week, one broad­cas­ter on Fri­day bit­terly encap­su­la­ted the sense of bur­ning shame and anger that many Ame­ri­can citi­zens are fee­ling.

The only dif­fe­rence bet­ween the chaos of New Orleans and a Third World disas­ter ope­ra­tion, he said, was that a foreign dic­ta­tor would have res­pon­ded better.

It has been a pro­foundly shoc­king expe­rience for many across this vast country who, for the large part, believe the home-spun myth about the invul­ne­ra­bi­lity of the Ame­ri­can Dream.

The party in power in Washing­ton is always happy to con­vey the impres­sion of 50 sta­tes moving for­ward together in social and eco­no­mic har­mony towards a big­ger and bet­ter America.

That is what pre­si­den­tial cam­paig­ning is all about.

But what the devas­ta­ting con­se­quen­ces of Katrina have shown — along with the res­ponse to it — is that for too long now, the fabric of this com­plex and overs­tretched country, espe­cially in sta­tes like Loui­siana and Mis­sis­sippi, has been neglec­ted and ignored.

Borro­wed time

The fit­ting metaphors rela­ting to the New Orleans debacle are almost too nume­rous to mention.

First there was an extraor­di­nary com­pla­cency, mixed together with what see­med like over-reaction, before the storm.

A genui­nely heroic mayor orders a total eva­cua­tion of the city the day before Katrina arri­ves, kno­wing that for deca­des now, New Orleans has been living on borro­wed time.

The Natio­nal Guard and fede­ral emer­gency per­son­nel stay tuc­ked up at home.

The havoc of Katrina had been pre­dic­ted count­less times on a local and fede­ral level — even to the point where it was ack­now­led­ged that tens of thou­sands of the poo­rest resi­dents would not be able to leave the city in advance.

No offi­cial plan was ever put in place for them.

Aban­do­ned to the ele­ments

The famous levees that were breached could have been strengthe­ned and rai­sed at what now seems like a tri­fling cost of a few billion dollars.

The Bush admi­nis­tra­tion, together with Con­gress, cut the bud­gets for flood pro­tec­tion and army engi­neers, while local poli­ti­cians fai­led to gene­rate any enthu­siasm for local tax inc­rea­ses.

New Orleans partied-on just hoping for the best, aban­do­ned by anyone in natio­nal autho­rity who could have put the money into really pro­tec­ting the city.

Meanwhile, the poo­rest were simi­larly aban­do­ned, as the horrif­ying ima­ges and sto­ries from the Super­dome and Con­ven­tion Cen­ter prove.

The truth was sim­ple and appa­rent to all. If jour­na­lists were there with came­ras bea­ming the suf­fe­ring live across Ame­rica, where were the offi­cers and troops?

The neglect that meant it took five days to get water, food, and medi­cal care to thou­sands of mainly orderly African-American citi­zens des­pe­ra­tely shel­te­ring in huge down­town buil­dings of their native city, has been going on his­to­ri­cally, for as long as the ina­de­quate levees have been there.

Divi­ded city

I should make a con­fes­sion at this point: I have been to New Orleans on assign­ment three times in as many years, and I was smit­ten by the Big Easy, with its uni­que charms and temperament.

But behind the ele­gant into­xi­cants of the French Quar­ter, it was clearly a city gro­tes­quely divi­ded on seve­ral levels. It has twice the natio­nal ave­rage poverty rate.

The govern­ment approach to such depri­va­tion loo­ked more like thought­less con­tain­ment than anything else.

The nightly shoo­tings and drugs-related homi­ci­des of recent years poin­ted to a small but vicious cul­ture of lar­gely black-on-black crime that ever­yone knew exis­ted, but no-one see­med to have any real ans­wers for.

Again, no-one wan­ted to pick up the bill or deal with the rea­li­ties of race rela­tions in the 21st Century.

Too often in the so-called “New South”, they still look posi­ti­vely 19th Century.

“Shoot the loo­ters” is good rhe­to­ric, but no las­ting solution.

Uneasy para­dox

It is asto­nishing to me that so many Ame­ri­cans seem shoc­ked by the exis­tence of such con­cen­tra­ted poverty and social neglect in their own country.

In the wor­kout room of the condo where I am currently sta­ying in the affluent LA neigh­bourhood of Santa Monica, an exe­cu­tive and his per­so­nal trai­ner igno­red the anguished tele­vi­sion reports bla­ring above their heads on Fri­day evening.

Either they did not care, or it was somehow too pain­ful to discuss.

When Pre­si­dent Bush told “Good Mor­ning Ame­rica” on Thurs­day mor­ning that nobody could have “anti­ci­pa­ted” the breach of the New Orleans levees, it poin­ted to not only a remote lea­der in denial, but a whole poli­ti­cal class.

The uneasy para­dox which so many live with in this country — of being first-and-foremost rug­ged indi­vi­duals, out to plun­der what they can and paying as little tax as they can get away with, while at the same time belie­ving that Ame­rica is a robust, model society — has reached a cri­sis point this week.

Will there be real invest­ment, or just more buck-passing bet­ween fede­ral agen­cies and states?

The country has to choose whether it wants to rebuild the levees and des­tro­yed com­mu­ni­ties, with no expense spa­red for the future — or once again brush off that res­pon­si­bi­lity, and blame the other guy. 

  • Discussion
  • Comments Off

« Previous Entries

Next Entries »