« Previous Entries

Video playback in google video

Jun 27 2005

Well, today I was trea­ted with the plea­sant sur­prise of goo­gle video adding fully func­tio­nal video pla­ying sup­port to their goo­gle video ser­vice. Peo­ple have gra­dually been uploa­ding their videos to goo­gle and various tele­vi­sion sta­tions have sub­mit­ted their shows with search able clo­sed cap­tions. Until now this was the extent of the video ser­vice, you could see when a show aired, search its script, seen when new shows were going to air and see a sim­ple screen shot taken so far in. All this being pretty use­less to someone living in the Uni­ted King­dom (although still very cool, I hope for some BBC inte­gra­tion soon). Now howe­ver, goo­gle video pro­vi­des video. Goo­gle results that have a pla­ya­ble video show up with a little play icon next to them. Upon ope­ning the page there are options to start the video from various 30 second inc­re­ments, upon clic­king, the video plays right there and then in the brow­ser. Now, most in brow­ser video pla­yers are fairly bulky, con­sume con­si­de­ra­ble resour­ces, load the brow­ser with unnee­ded hin­dran­ces, pro­vide anno­ying applet con­trols and require buf­fe­ring times. Howe­ver, goo­gle video is based upon the popu­lar and utterly fan­tas­tic open source “video­lan pla­yer” open source setup. VLC gene­rally plays all stan­dard codecs with ease and has highly func­tio­nal strea­ming options, sub­tit­les, mul­ti­ple video and audio stream capa­bi­li­ties and much much more (inc­lu­ding the option to view a video in ASCII). This goo­gle video vie­wer loads seam­lessly, has no nasty but­ton inter­fa­ces, does not load the brow­ser or cause over the top cpu usage and has a once click full-screen option (i.e. click the video for fullsc­reen). The video requi­res very little buf­fe­ring time and is of sui­ta­ble qua­lity and reso­lu­tion for fullsc­reen and tele­vi­sion play­back. I really do love it and I have been pla­ying for the last hour or so.

“The clips play right in the page using the brand new Goo­gle Video Vie­wer, which was crea­ted by our engi­neer Aaron Lee using code from the open source Video­lan pro­ject. It works great in both Fire­fox and IE, and we’ve desig­ned it not to fight with any other video plu­gins you might have. We’re relea­sing the Win­dows ver­sion first, with Mac coming soon.”

Now all this needs is some con­tent, currently the majo­rity of videos are not pla­ya­ble, a nice option would be to search for pla­ya­ble videos only. As this resource grows it should become extre­mely valua­ble. Currently only a few pro­vi­ders such as games­pot and green­peace have run­ning videos on the search, but as more and more videos appear, the abi­lity to search video desc­rip­tions and clo­sed cap­tions com­bi­ned with the 30 second / full video play­back options will take pre­ce­dence over other current Inter­net services.


“A fea­ture we’re espe­cially plea­sed with is search within a video, which means you will get a result poin­ting to the pre­cise spot in the video that matches your query. Try loo­king for ser­gey brin and you’ll see what I mean. There are even more peo­ple get­ting crea­tive with video here. So have fun watching, or shoot your own videos — and keep sen­ding them in!”

Here are some links:
http://​video​.goo​gle​.com/​v​i​d​e​o​_​a​b​o​u​t​.​h​tml
Plays­ta­tion 3 trai­lers such as Kill­zone
Goo­gle Blog Entry

“Our mis­sion is to orga­nize the world’s infor­ma­tion, and that inc­lu­des the thou­sands of pro­grams that play on our TVs every day. Goo­gle Video ena­bles you to search a gro­wing archive of tele­vi­sed con­tent – everything from sports to dino­saur docu­men­ta­ries to news shows.”

  • Discussion
  • Comments Off

Current top 50 artists snapshot

Jun 27 2005
Last gene­ra­ted: June 27, 2005
1 Nick
Drake
202 
2 Elliott
Smith
170 
3 The
Microphones
112 
4 RJD2
93 
5 Iron
& Wine
91 
6 Sage
Francis
86 
7 Klaus
Badelt
85 
8 The
Arcade Fire
84 
9 Night­wish
82 
10 Eva
Cassidy
72 
10 Shi­ning
72 
12 Ennio
Morricone
71 
13 Leo­nard
Cohen
64 
13 Simon
& Garfunkel
64 
15 The
Decemberists
61 
16 Radiohead
60 
17 Pixies
58 
17 David
Bowie
58 
17 2
Many DJ’s
58 
17 Kenji
Kawai
58 
21 Air
57 
22 Gran­daddy
56 
22 Vene­tian
Snares
56 
24 M83
55 
24 The
Shins
55 
26 Inter­pol
54 
27 Pink
Floyd
53 
28 Ministry
of Sound
52 
29 The
Beatles
50 
29 Ludo­vico
Einaudi
50 
31 The
Dust Brothers
48 
32 65daysofstatic
47 
33 Neko
Case
46 
33 Mar­tin
O’Donnell & Michael Salvatori
46 
35 Moby
44 
36 Pen­guin
Cafe Orchestra
43 
36 Strap­ping
Young Lad
43 
36 Ted
Leo and the Pharmacists
43 
39 Tan
Dun
42 
40 Boards
of Canada
41 
41 Angelo
Badalamenti
37 
41 Squi­rrel
Nut Zippers
37 
41 R.E.M.
37 
44 DJ
Shadow
36 
45 Steely
Dan
35 
45 Françoise
Hardy
35 
47 Queen
34 
47 The
Prodigy
34 
49 Blac­ka­li­cious
33 
49 Les
Savy Fav
33 

2nd year is over now.

Jun 24 2005

In a sud­den bout of enthu­siasm for my blog, I deci­ded to create another jour­nal entry. Yes, once again I am going to talk about my life. Over the past week or so I have gra­dually inc­lu­ded all the old cute-news posts I made from 2003 to the end of last year, in doing so I got quite sen­ti­men­tal, rea­ding about the anno­ying lady on the bus, the pineap­ple squash adven­ture and the start of uni­ver­sity. I was also sad that I hadn’t kept up my wri­ting and writ­ten more about my time at university.

Well, as men­tio­ned in a pre­vious post, I have suc­cess­fully finished my exams and con­se­quen­tially my second year at War­wick Uni­ver­sity. The year star­ted off rather slow, I was lear­ning some basic modu­les that were overly sim­ple and all things I’d done before, i.e. c++ pro­gram­ming and how a diode works. My lec­tu­res were dull; I really had no exci­ting labs and most of the time I was at my Lea­ming­ton home pla­ying on Xbox live. I’d tra­vel in for a “star­ting a busi­ness” module and tra­vel home an hour later, a round bus trip las­ting 3 hours. As win­ter approached, some half modu­les ended and my time­ta­ble became even less busy, it really did take the piss how little work I had to do that term.

Side NTL rant:
A lot of my spare time was spent sor­ting out the Xbox live setup my inter­net ser­vice pro­vi­der had set me up with (NTL). Essen­tially, I and my hou­se­mate had opted for the Xbox live option at a cost of an extra £2 per month. Howe­ver, come Octo­ber and there was no sign of what we were actually purcha­sing, what was this £2 buying? There was also a £50 setup charge on the first bill per­tai­ning to a con­sole rela­ted ser­vice. What exactly this was we had no idea. Follo­wing a good few hours on the phone and no one at their cus­to­mer ser­vice desk kno­wing what the fuck, we were still con­fu­sed. The con­fu­sion dee­pe­ned as an Xbox arri­ved at the door. NTL sent us an Xbox. Why, we have no idea, we already had an Xbox and only wan­ted some sort of live pac­kage. Back on the phone for another few hours, tal­king to more peo­ple who didn’t even know what an Xbox was. I ini­tially said I wan­ted to send this Xbox back and not pay the £50 for it, so the pay­ment was put into dis­pute until they recei­ved the con­sole back. Then I chan­ged my mind, £50 for an Xbox is a very good deal I thought. So I ring back, and con­ti­nue asking what this live deal should be offe­ring me, telling them to take the money for the Xbox and various other things I don’t par­ti­cu­larly remem­ber 9 months on. Well, they then send me a long Ether­net cable, a 3 month maga­zine subsc­rip­tion and a 12 month Xbox live deal; a deal that I should have ori­gi­nally been given accor­ding to an out­da­ted page of their web­site. In sor­ting this out I tried con­tac­ting their con­sole con­tact line, the ini­tial press one to go here auto­ma­ted ser­vice wor­ked, but the redi­rects went to unk­nown num­bers and a dead end. In trying to explain this to the stan­dard cus­to­mer ser­vi­ces I was gree­ted with “it’s wor­king, I hear the voice” and other stu­pid res­pon­ses that pro­ved these peo­ple were obviously not lis­te­ning to exactly what I was trying to tell them. Need­less to say, ever­yone was get­ting frus­tra­ted. Well, now I am coming to the end of my 9 month NTL con­tract and des­pite rin­ging them 4 times and telling them to take my money, they still haven’t and the amount is still appa­rently in dis­pute. I don’t know, their ser­vice is a pile of wank and they cap users to 1.5 GB down­load per day. But other than that we’ve had no pro­blems. I wish I could have Blue-yonder in my region.

Well, as Christ­mas approached, the days got shor­ter and col­der. Our old Vic­to­rian seven birth house does not fair par­ti­cu­larly well in cold con­di­tions. In fact, at times you could see your breath when breathing inside. We nee­ded radia­tors on per­ma­nently and addi­tio­nal elec­tric hea­ters just to melt the ice blocks that were our feet. The land-lord had also pain­ted the downs­tairs bath­room with a non-bathroom paint directly onto the walls. This meant that mould began gro­wing. Not all that delight­ful and it took the cake when there was a lovely little mush­room stic­king out of the cor­ner of the room. This was my house in win­ter, mouldy, cold and draughty. We gave the land-lord a list of nee­ded fixes for the house over the Christ­mas period and hoped they would get done, luc­kily they were and our house was much more plea­sant and livea­ble during the second term.

The first term saw a lot of drama in the house, two hou­se­ma­tes split up with their boy­friends from long term rela­tionships, there were family ill­nes­ses and it was all very taxing, but we stuck together and carried our­sel­ves through all the pro­blems. Things per­ked up towards the end and we were happy at our Christ­mas din­ner where, once again, Sam deligh­ted us all with a fan­tas­tic meal that was far too large for our tiny wobbly kitchen table. Other note­worthy events were Sam’s birth­day party in which we cram­med into a small Mexi­can res­tau­rant and ate burri­tos, our lovely anni­ver­sary trip around Lea­ming­ton park and meal at Thai restaurant.

Well, moving on into term 2, it remai­ned cold and our hea­ters sta­yed on cons­tantly. My course intro­du­ced me to a new set of modu­les for the follo­wing ten weeks; finally I would be doing some work and something inte­res­ting. I also had a few time­ta­bled labs to attend in which I pla­yed with mic­ro­pro­ces­sors, bread­boards and wrote some sim­ple c++ code for a sim­ple c++ pro­ject. My birth­day came and went and I tur­ned 20. We all pac­ked together and pla­yed ultra­vio­let ten pin bow­ling and enjo­yed the luxu­ries of Fran­kie and Benny’s menu. I opted for the steak and also finished off other people’s meals while bull­ying a helium balloon. Sadly my day was cut short when I had to take Sam home via taxi, she’d become vio­lently ill and it was extre­mely dis­tres­sing, par­ti­cu­larly as there was no obvious rea­son for it. It was made up for by the pres­ti­gious gifts and cand­le­lit meal she pre­pa­red for me. We also went bow­ling and had pizza for Steven’s birth­day and all was rela­ti­vely merry in the Tach­brook camp.

Sam’s just called me so I’m going to have to cut this blog short. I’ll pro­bably carry it on when I next have some free time. This shouldn’t be too long away.

  • Discussion
  • Comments Off

MIT physicists create new form of matter

Jun 24 2005

MIT News Office: “CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — MIT scien­tists have brought a super­cool end to a hea­ted race among phy­si­cists: They have become the first to create a new type of mat­ter, a gas of atoms that shows high-temperature superfluidity.”

“In super­fluids, as well as in super­con­duc­tors, par­tic­les move in locks­tep. They form one big quantum-mechanical wave,” explai­ned Ket­terle. “Such a move­ment allows super­con­duc­tors to carry elec­tri­cal currents without resistance.”

For those who know not of superfluidity:

Ans​wers​.com: Super­flui­dity is a phase of mat­ter cha­rac­te­ri­sed by the com­plete absence of vis­co­sity. Thus super­fluids, pla­ced in a clo­sed loop, can flow end­lessly without friction.

  • Discussion
  • Comments Off

The Microphones — The Glow pt.2

Jun 21 2005
Thumbnail
Title: The Glow pt.2
Artist: The Mic­ropho­nes
Style: “The Glow Pt. 2 is the sound of one man wor­king through a chan­ging lands­cape — a sin­gle voice cha­llen­ging its surroun­dings while also accep­ting that it’s power­less to alter them. The Glow Pt. 2 is unpre­dic­ta­ble, vola­tile, vibrant, terrif­ying, and com­for­ting. The Glow Pt. 2 is alive.“
Review: Pitch­fork | Mount Eerie Pre­ser­va­tion Society
My Rating: 10/10
  • Discussion
  • Comments Off

« Previous Entries