« Previous Entries
Next Entries »
Aug 24 2003
Here is a shorlist (aka reminder) of movies coming out that I am not only interested in, but need to see.
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind : Charlie Kaufman’s latest starring Jim Carey and Kate Winslet
“A couple (Jim Carrey and Kate Winslet) attempt to rescue their failing relationship by having their bad memories erased. Elijah Woods plays one of these technicians performing this operation.” Aint it Cool Review
Kill Bill : NEW Tarantino KB Vol 1 @ IMDB
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory : Tim Burton IMDB
Lost in Translation : Sofia Coppola latest with Bill Murray and Scarlet Johanssen… Perfect IMDB
Jersey Girl : Kevin Smith IMDB
21 Grams : Alejandro González Iñárritu (Director of Amores Perros)
That’ll do pig, that’ll do for now.
Aug 24 2003
95 minutes. That is how long I have just spent watching Paul Thomas Anderson’s Punch-Drunk love. The film stars Adam Sandler, Emily Watson and Philip Seymour Hoffman. I am a great fan of Anderson’s work; Magnolia being one of my favourite movies. I am also a fan of Philip Seymour Hoffman; he has played so many roles and he has pulled them all off so superbly (e.g. Happiness, Almost Famous). It was these two factors that tempted me to watch this movie. Had it not been for them this delight would have never made itself known to me, I being a deep loather of most Adam Sandler movies; not because of Mr. Sandler but because of the type and style of movie he is usually in. Take for instance Little Nicky, Waterboy, Airheads and even Shakes the Clown — movies designed specifically so you don’t have to think, don’t have to feel; just laugh. I am not attracted to mainstream one liners and predictable plots — if I know how something works, how something will pan out, there are no surprises, there are no laughs and the movie is a waste of time. That said, Adam Sandler can make me laugh and his sarcastc voice is a plus (I think).
So, anyway, having previewed the movie at IMDB and duly noted the nice people involved, I decided to watch the movie when I had the chance. Going in with low expectations. I was hooked from the beginning, it must have been the whole randomness of the introduction (truck, topple, harpsichord, smashing, “I don’t know if there is anything wrong because I don’t know how other people are”). But whatever it was, I was intrigued and eager to know just what was going to happen; having no ideas of the actual plot to the movie.
The first thing I should mention is the art direction. It is simply supreme;
” In a grocery store scene, the items are stacked vertically by color (echoing the color bars that appear periodically between scenes), making the scene appear otherworldly. Other sets are bare of color or distinction. Sandler’s love interest in the film (played by Emily Watson) lives in a maze of white corridors. Somehow, every “place” in the film has its own character and association. Even the characters become associated with particular colors“
All in all, the cinematrography is excellent and the same can be said for the use of light and colors.
Emily Watson who plays Sandler’s love interest holds a seemingly magical and dream like quality. I felt drawn to her as Barry Egan was. Her appearance, actions, dialogue and mysterious character coupled with child-like good looks held me in a grasp similar to Egan’s throughout the feature. Perfect.
I normally shy away from movies that clutter too much into a scene. Take for instance Brazil *shudders*. I hate it when I can’t work out what is going on, when the noise gives you a headache and the camera keeps switching all over the place. There is a scene I would describe like this in PDL but it is in fact one of my favourite scenes in the movie;
“What about the great scene where Lena and Barry’s sister enter his warehouse? The speed of the scene seems to increase almost out of control as his sister harps and leaves, then Lena gets involved in a conversation with him just as the phone sex operator continues to call and make threats, and with the forklift crashing…and Barry takes it all in stride. The scene overwhelms the audience…but Barry seems keyed in only on Lena while casually acknowledging all of the wild things going on around him…fantastic scene where even I felt out of breath!”
As for Barry, I felt for him and could often relate to his dilemas and opinions. When he got conned out of his cash I felt bad. When he pounded the blonds I felt good and when he fell in love, so too did I. It is movies like these that are simply above any other type of movie. I do not care if this movie is pretentious or too arty, has too many undeveloped plots or is too weird — It made me feel something, I got something out of the movie, and for that I am forever grateful. Not many movies can do that, but this one did. Sandler should take more challenging roles, Anderson should make more movies and people who have not seen this… should.
Im done. Fork in me stick.
Aug 23 2003
Why I didn’t like Equilibrium
I really didn’t like this movie. If it wasn’t for Christian Bale and the “gun-kung-fu” this movie incorporates, it would have been a flop. The actual idea of the movie is not plausible however it does allow for an interesting storyline — but this movie does not explore it well enough. We see very little of people’s daily life and there are many flaws along with concepts the writers have not thought about. It merely touches the surface of something that could be brilliant.
For instance they did not mention how the people distinguish between what is right and wrong. Even without emotion a human would still have the ability to question something — and as a result of the question an action would arise, simply “to see what happens”. However without the guidance of emotion (such as guilt or pleasure) the person cannot know whether the thing that he has done is wrong or not. These can be simple things such as stealing someone’s pen or more drastic such as murder. Hence it would not be a perfect state.
Example of a flaw: Towards the end when Preston is on the “emotion detector”, the person standing behind him says, “Shit”. There are also loads of continuity mistakes.
I think it did snatch ideas from other places and few parts of it are original. There are very strong similarities with 1984, in particular the dangerous children.
I also found “Father’s” voice over annoying and the invention of a miracle drug (protium) to remove emotion was IMO a poor way of rendering people emotionless. I did enjoy the twist in the office where his new partner turns him in though and samurai swords are always cool. The fight scenes were moderate — consisting mainly of a man bouncing up and down shooting over his shoulder.
Oh and the Mona Lisa is not painted on a canvas, it’s painted on a wooden plate.
Aug 23 2003
I watched Brazil and it just didn’t appeal. Spoilers herein.
I understand how others have enjoyed it, for instance the future that holds an essence of the past — along with small tidbit sayings that appear thoughout, such as:
“Sam Lowry: How are the twins?
Jack Lint: Triplets.
Sam Lowry: My, how time flies!”
These made me chuckle.
What I didn’t like. The pipes, these just annoy me despite their representation and meaning within the movie — the strangling hold, the clutter, the concealed mess that overflows — a definition of the movie itself. The primitive animal-like noise they produce.
Watching this movie I simply became more and more frustrated, so much so that I had to turn it off and take a break before watching the last half hour. The movie lacked a basic structure. Bounding through random hallucinations it just became a mesmerizing downward spiral with added extravagant and exagerated ideas and concepts poured in to add depth. This coupled with poor production and very shoddy effects provide for an unpleasant viewing expirience. In watching the movie I felt like Mr Tuttle when the papers kept coming at him — a moments peace could not be had.
I am not saying this movie shouldn’t be a classic. It has much more going for it than many other movies, particularly in the sci-fi fantasy genres. I am saying that this movie was not enjoyed — I do not enjoy watching people stumble, make mistakes and suffer effects of misunderstandings and comic errors. The story, although being a fantasy became inplausible, impossible and blurred. I did not feel the need to watch more as there was no suspense, there was no desire to know what was happening or what was going to happen — why would there be when all the movie is doing is expanding on a basic idea while deviating further from the norm. Any conclusion that could have been provided would not have accounted for the mess preceding it.
If I could sum up my prescise feelings on this movie it would be through a quote from it,
“What is this mess? An empty desk is an efficient desk.”
The mental escape of the main character at the end of the movie, his desired freedom from such a reality was the same feeling I had as the credits began to “appear”.
Aug 23 2003
I have a similar problem to this:
http://www.experts-exchange.com/Operating_Systems/WinXP/Q_20705523.html
“MMC cannot open services.msc
This may be because the file does not exist, it is not an MMC console, or was created by a later version of MMC.
This may also be because you do not have sufficient access rights to the file.”
This happens for any .msc file. The files can be run manually via the MMC console however.
“I also just noticed that run/find doesn’t work either. It complains about not being able to find a file it needs to run. At least it said so nicely in a large, pretty XP box.“
I have this problem also. I also have multiple script errors when viewing microsoft help files and playing zone.com games on MSN6.
I have searched hi and low on the internet for a solution to this but nothing has as of yet helped. A user who also had this problem mentioned the AverTv card and possible driver related issues. I have also used this card but have since removed it.
Solutions I have tried:
New admin users show the same problems, as do restricted users.
” SFC /scannow” didn’t help.
HELP!
« Previous Entries
Next Entries »